|
|||||||||||
|
Info/Contact for David Akin
Search this blog:
Login
Who pays for this blog? I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service. The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service. I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here. If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section |
Record Industry appeals download ruling
Earlier this month, Canada's biggest record companies, acting through the Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA), lost a key court ruling.
The Federal Court of Canada ruled that CRIA was not entitled to force some of Canada's largest ISPs to turn over private customer data that the record companies say they needed to commence with lawsuits against 29 Canadians for illegally downloading music.
In his ruling, Judge Konrad von Finckenstein said that the CRIA had failed to make a case that copyright infringement was actually happening -- essentially saying a P2P file-sharing system was not illegal under Canadian law -- and that the record companies had not presented any evidence that forcing ISPs to turn over customer records was the only way CRIA could proceed.
CRIA filed an appeal of that ruling late last week. In that appeal, CRIA claims von Finckenstein made several errors.
Of some note, given the fact that the Judge essentially said in his ruling that CRIA's lawyers did a lousy job of presenting any evidence, CRIA appears to be keeping the same law firm to handle the appeal.
Keywords:
copyright
Comments
No comments found.
|
Recent Comments
Canadian Politics Twitter Feed Top Stories This Month
Month Archive
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||

