U.S. Comptroller General David Walker was asked by a Congressional committee for his opinions on a range of issues related to defence procurement and contracting. This week, he filed a written response to some of those questsions.
Canada, of course, embarked this year on more than $17-billion in new defence acquisitions of planes, ships, trucks and helicopters and next year, if Cabinet finally gets around to it, Canada could embark on another round of multi-billion dollar spending.
Among the issues Walker addresses is whether or not defence should buy into leading or bleeding-edge technology. Canada doesn't do a lot of that, but there are weapons systems from time to time that are out there on the edge of the available technology that Canada wants to adopt..
Walker says:
"It is essential that technology be developed separately—and before—the development phase of a product or weapon system. This is a best practice that results in predictable program outcomes. Our work shows programs that proceed with mature technology average about 5 percent cost growth; programs with immature technology experience about 35 percent cost growth. Moreover, immature technology delays design and production maturity."
|
||||||||
|
Recent Comments
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
|
Should the militaries of the world pay for bleeding-edge technology?
No comments found.
|
Canada.com
National Post Who pays for this blog? I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service. The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Blogware users typically pay a monthly fee for using this platform but I do not as Tucows has kindly provided me with this platform. I may report on Tucows, its associated operations and executives, and on industry issues that may affect Tucows. I am grateful for Tucows' assistance but that's it. No favours were promised for their generosity nor do Tucows executives expect any. I hold no direct equity or stock in any company, Tucows included. If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section |
||||||
|
||||||||
Errata, observations and working notes