
|
|||||||||||
|
Info/Contact for David Akin
Search this blog:
Login
Who pays for this blog? I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service. The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service. I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here. If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section |
The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
Liberal researches are distributing the following images, which I pass along without comment, other than to say the top image compares covers of the printed copy of the Governor General's Throne Speech to the cover of the Conservative Party platform document from the last election. The bottom compares colour schemes from Conservative Party web sites to current government Web sites.
![]()
Comments
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
ChrisInKW
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:05 PM EDT | Permanent Link
I took a few screen caps of the Con website and GC websites back in the New Year that clearly showed the exact same colour scheme and word marks (e.g. "True north strong and free") being used interchangeably throughout both. Glad to see someone else has come to the same conclusion.
Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:20 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Who cares since is such a great colour. Are we going to look at everything that has the same blue of the Conservative logo? So I guess my walls were painted by the conservative party of Canada since it is the same blue of their logo.
This is unreal. Liberals are down in the polls and the media want the conservative to go down in the polls like the Liberals and they find things that are not issues. Because they know they have nothing else to say against the government. Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Maple Moose
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:20 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Way to go liberal staffers...don't worry about having no policy or anything. We are paying you? I wonder if the the color of the Liberal party logo is the same as that of the Canadian flag........oh wait, yes it is. Do something constructive or get a real job. those of us who are paying your salary are getting a little miffed.
Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:21 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Hear! Hear!
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:34 PM EDT | Permanent Link
This is the stupidest blog posting ever, Akin. Dalton McGuinty's latest budget had a red cover. Get it? Liberal red? See it now? You know, Jane Taber's pop-culture pap reporting is not worth emulating.
Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 02:47 PM EDT | Permanent Link
You have to ask yourself why the Republicons would do something like this. I'll tell you: they think they can brainwash the public into liking them with jedi mind tricks. If you believe the unrepresentative sample upon which Ispos/national Post polls are based, you would think it's working. It's not. One the public comes to the full realization that the government thinks Canadians need to be fooled into voting conservative, rather than being presented with real conservative ideas (which the vast majority of Canadians don't support -- even the Ipsos polls show that, as most Canadians support more or less progressive parties). All that really matters is the election campaign. Then both con and liberal leaders will be given equal coverage, the liberals will release their platform (why release it now so the cons can steal the good ideas and trash the bad ones?) and the polls will move Liberal.
Re: Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
R.B.
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 04:48 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Jedi mind tricks, anonymous?
Just to let you in on a secret: such things exist in a series of movies. There are no `Jedi mind tricks' in politics or in real life. On the other hand, your belief in Jedi mind tricks may explain why it is you think that the CPC has `tricked' the public into voting for them, twice... (I won't even bother with the formulation, "Republicons") Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Jared
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 03:34 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Also let it be known that the design world is upset at your lack of correct colour terminology to enhance your title.
The value #333399 is not a Pantone colour, but rather an RGB hex combination. Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
The second set doesn't bother me so much - I'm sure it's just revenge for the Liberals using Canada Red all these years.
The matching covers are far more worrisome because (at best) it means that both the Government and the Party paid the same photographer and presumably the same art department to design both covers. At worst, it means the photographer/designer is actively working for both simultaneously. Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
The Invisible Hand
on Thu 29 Oct 2009 02:42 AM EDT | Permanent Link
Or, both the CPC and the Gov't of Canada bought the same stock footage.
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Tony Clark
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 03:51 PM EDT | Permanent Link
The photo of the flag and mountain were taken at the Banff Parks Administration Building - i.e. a federal government building. The mountain in the background is Cascade Mountain.
Having been born and raised in Banff, I'd recognize that view anywhere. I guess my question is: is it kosher to use public sites for partisan political materials? Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 04:01 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Pot: meet kettle.
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 07:13 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Isn't it sort of an indictment of the Liberal research folks that it took 9 months for them to notice this? Could there be better evidence that the Liberals don't really bother to read anything the Conservatives release or propose? Or is down 15 points to the Tories the opportune time to release such a scathing bit of stuff... Please.
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 07:52 PM EDT | Permanent Link
David David David....to think you used to have credibility.....I was wondering how long it would take you to follow Jane Taber into the land of wasted skill.......you are indeed very disappointing!
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 08:00 PM EDT | Permanent Link
This fuss just goes to show what expert political manipulators the Liberals are. After all, the original design for the Canadian flag had blue stripes on either side (a representation of from sea to sea). this was nixed at the last minute in favour of the Liberal friendly red.
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 08:59 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Oh, come on. #333399 is a Web-safe colour. Of course if it looks the same, it probably is. And you know, public servants made that gov't Web page, not the Conservatives.
It is pretty funny how desperate folks like you are getting trying to find some "dirt" that'll stick. "Gotcha!" You know what they say about the boy who cried wolf. Re: Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 09:25 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Does that mean they got a discount?!
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Gabby in QC
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 09:45 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Oh, Gawd! Is this what Canadian political discourse has come to?
I often hear MPs about checking "the blues" - referring, I believe, to the transcript of whatever has been said during Question Period. Will the Liberals next demand that expression - "the blues" - be changed to "the reds"? Or maybe to the "non-offensive and non-partisan beige"? Will they demand singers no longer sing "the blues"? Or ban songs like these?: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060908210947AAI8rSG What a bunch of maroons! Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
john g
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 11:01 PM EDT | Permanent Link
If this is all the Liberals have to offer, perhaps the government could introduce a motion of non confidence in the opposition, and just let the NDP take over as Official opposition.
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Tue 27 Oct 2009 11:47 PM EDT | Permanent Link
so what the hell is your point?
Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Chris Taylor
on Wed 28 Oct 2009 12:25 PM EDT | Permanent Link
I agree this seems like a dopey thing to go after, since there is no enforceable exclusivity on colour.
But on the other hand, that's why this is an item in a blog, presented, as the author says, without comment. If it was real news it would be in the papers or on the air under Akin's byline. This is his personal blog; he's allowed to cover other things here. Perspective, folks? Re: The Colours of (Stephen Harper's) Canada: That would be Pantone #333399
by
Anonymous
on Wed 28 Oct 2009 02:10 PM EDT | Permanent Link
silly liberals
http://themiw.tumblr.com/post/202123977/a-maple-leaf-by-any-other-shade-wouldnt-be-as-red Reflex Blue: One of the most common Pantone colour used.
by
Anonymous
on Wed 28 Oct 2009 04:14 PM EDT | Permanent Link
'nuff said.
According to my copy of GIMP...
by
Anonymous
on Wed 28 Oct 2009 04:24 PM EDT | Permanent Link
The top image is #253B87 and the bottom image is #273C95.
|
Recent Comments
Top Stories This Month
Month Archive
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||