Info/Contact for David Akin

Get On The Hill updates in your RSS reader

David Akin's Facebook profile

Search this blog:
Custom Search
Subscribe to this blog using your favourite feed reader:
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 

Who pays for this blog?
I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service.
The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service.
I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here.
If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at
www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section



Re: Flanagan to Conservatives: Suck it up!
by hollinm
Horrors the CPC spent their own money on advertising in the last election. They split those advertising dollars between national and local campaigns. In keeping with how they perceived the rules they applied for a rebate for a portion of those local advertising expenses which is normal practice I gather. EC (Elections Canada) didn't like it and so refused to reimburse those local advertising expenses. Because of this decision the CPC is said to have exceeded the ceiling of $18 million by approx. $1 million. The CPC's position is that EC is wrong and therefore launched a lawsuit to force EC to reimburse the local campaigns. What could happen here? The courts rule in either EC's favour or the CPC. If its in favour of the latter there is no violation of election expenses. If the court rules in favour of the former the CPC party is out the amount being requested for reimbursement and the party is fined for exceeding election spending. That's it in a nutshell folks. To prove criminal activity will be a hard sell and before that happens a negotitated settlement will take place. While the opposition parties and some media will play this up with sensationalistic headlines as if it is the worst thing that could happen ordinary folks will not be able to understand this whole thing much less care about it. They are busy trying to earn enough money to pay for gas that is now costing $1.30 a litre. If the Libs think this is their ticket to power they better think again. I asked my married children who don't follow politics at all and are busy working and raising their familes if they heard about the in and out issue. They all looked at me with a blank look on their faces. When I explained it as best I could they laughed and mentioned they were happy with the $100.00 a month they were receiving for their children.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.
   

Top Stories
This Month
April 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
Year Archive