|
|||||
|
Info/Contact for David Akin
Search this blog:
Login
Who pays for this blog? I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service. The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service. I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here. If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section |
Re: Re: Goodale's factors for "a rationale for change"
by
hollinm
Mr. Goodale has to be one of the most pompous, igotistical politicians I have ever seen sitting in the House of Commons. His feigned outrage daily during QP is legendary and has even resulted in the Speaker publicly admonishing him for his antics.
Mr. Goodale is best known as a finance minister who presided over 3 budgets in 2005; one so they could buy the support of the NDP. That is unheard of from any government. Sound fiscal management I think not. He helped destroy the income trust market when John MacKay speculated that the Libs were considering a 30% tax on income trusts. Then facing pressure backed off going into an election but allowing sufficient time to let Brison advise his friends in the banking industry.
This former finance minister is part of a party who stole/misappropriated some $250 million of taxpayers' money so they could buy probably three elections in Quebec. Yet with all the hypocrisy he can muster accuses the Conservatives of being less than honest.
Now that he is in opposition he looks like a wild man appearing on Mike Duffy Live or other shows interupting people, sitting on the edge of his chair as if he about to jump out of it at any time. He is a true wind bag of the highest order.
Goodale should show us where the Conservatives have stolen taxpayers' money. He could not do it. He talks about the faux scandals.
Mulroney/Schreiber...anybody who believes that Harper and the Conservatives had anything to do with the relationship between these two men are dreaming in tecnicolour.
Cadman....nobody believes that the Conservatives would offer a dying man a $1 million life insurance policy. What the Cadman family may have heard or was told just not make sense. Canadians aren't buying it either.
The Conservatives did the right thing. If they don' agree with Elections Canada's ruling then let the court's decide. I hear all this talk about the integrity of Elections Canada. There are only humans running Elections Canada not dieties. They make mistakes. The courts have ruled against them before.
Canadians are not falling for the Liberal spin so Goodale and the Liberal crew can continue to hyperventilate but nobody is listening.
The biggest gift the Liberals have given the Conservatives is Stephane Dion. He will be the gift that keeps on giving in the election campaign.
|
Recent Comments
Top Stories This Month
Month Archive
|
|||
|
|||||

