|
|||||
|
Info/Contact for David Akin
Search this blog:
Login
Who pays for this blog? I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service. The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service. I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here. If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section |
Re: Re: Re: So tell me again: Why did we spend $3.4-billion on these things?
by
A Taxpayer
In an October 22 2003 speech the Minister of National Defence at the time, the Honourable John McCallum stated about Strategic Airlift:
"Over the past six fiscal years, Canada has spent approximately $107 million on strategic airlift, an average of $18 million per year. This is but a mere fraction of the annual interest on the cost of our own strategic airlift – let alone the capital cost... "
To avoid paying 18 million a year to charter Strategic Airlift, part of which went to US Air Force C-17s and C-5s by the way, we spent 3.4 billion dollars on Boeing C-17s, plus the fuel, the crew and the other expenses which are not included in the 3.4 billion dollars but which were included in the 18 million Minister McCallum mentioned.
Although it is true that now we are spending much more than 18 million dollars a year on airlift because of Afghanistan, but once that is over in 1, 2 or 3 years, we would have gone back to spending under 20 million a year on airlift had we not invested in these aircraft. However, with 4 CF C-17s at Trenton, our cost will more likely be 250 million a year once all is counted (acquisition, interests, contracts, fuel, crews etc).
If you think this was a good way to spend tax dollars and military procurement money, fine with me but tell the paying public the truth, not any BS about saving money thanks to C-17s.
|
Recent Comments
Top Stories This Month
Month Archive
|
|||
|
|||||

