Info/Contact for David Akin

Get On The Hill updates in your RSS reader

David Akin's Facebook profile

Search this blog:
Custom Search
Subscribe to this blog using your favourite feed reader:
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 

Who pays for this blog?
I receive no fees, considerations, etc. etc. for the posts on this blog nor do I have any plans to accept any. My salary is paid by Canwest Global Communications Corp. I work for that company as the Ottawa-based National Affairs Correspondent for Canwest News Service.
The blog publishing platform used here is called Blogware and it's developed by Tucows Inc. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. My use of Blogware should not be taken as an endorsement of that company. Like all Blogware users, I do not pay any fees for the use of this service.
I participate in program. Google pays me some money and, for that, I give Google some space on this site to display ads. Google sells those ads and Google, not me, decides what advertising content you are seeing. I do not filter these ads and take no responsibility for them. Readers should not assume I endorse any of the products or services advertised here.
If you think other disclosures are appropriate in this space, I'd like to hear from you. All of my contact details are always at
www.davidakin.com You can read more about this section



Re: Would Canadians elect a PM who is a social conservative and fiscal 'progressive"?
by Anonymous
David, I believe Canadians have - on several occassions. Depending on how you define "social conservative" of course. Jean Chretien and Paul Martin were both adamantly opposed to same sex marriage (until they weren't). Paul Martin, when he first ran for leader, promised to ban abortions. Chretien insisted he was pro-life. Trudeau, certainly fiscally "ultra-Liberal" promised the Cardinal of Toronto that he would use the notwithstandinig clause to strike down any court ruling that allowed abortion. So what's your litmus test for being "sociallly conservative"? If it's based on who funds Pride festivals, then the current government isn't - as your own previous post showed, what with all the funding that has gone to various events. In fact, didn't the head of the Montreal Pride festival come out and say the current government has been a better partner than the previous Liberal government? In fact, didn't Liberal Senator Art Eggleton, as mayor of Toronto, block Toronto from having any Pride events for six years? So, just like you're having difficulty stating what you mean by "fiscally ultra-liberal" I think you probably need to figure out what you mean by "socially conservative", because it seems like the current government you're criticizing is no more nor less "socially conservative" than previous Liberal and Conservative governments
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
Name: 
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
Email: 
Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.
   

Top Stories
This Month
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Year Archive